Tweets Reacts to Sergio Garcia's Apology to Tiger woods for 'Fried Chicken' Jab.

It's already been 10 days since Sergio Garcia accused Tiger woods of maliciously pulling a club from his bag during the Players Championship, but this feud is far from over.

Garcia made headlines upon Tuesday when he taken care of immediately a question (h/t Ewan Murray of the Guardian) posed by the Golf Channel's Steve Sands, who asked if yet have dinner with Woods within the U. S. Open.

What exactly followed could certainly be construed as racist, while using the Spaniard answering: "We will have him round every day. We will serve fried chicken. "

I apologise for any offence that appeared to be caused by my comment on stage during The Euro Tour Players' Awards dinner time. I answered a question which has been clearly made towards me as a joke with a ridiculous remark, but in no chance was the comment meant inside of a racist manner.

Tiger was clearly still upset for the situation, taking to Twitter at Wednesday morning to issue a response and scolding to this rival:

He wasn't on your own who took umbrage to your comments, as NFL. com's Ian Rapoport couldn't have an understanding of the rational behind Garcia's apology:

Godfrey, a co-host of Upload by using Shaq on Tru TELEVISION SET, believes Woods has to use the weak apology when motivation:

Cindy Boren within the Washington Post offers a particular possible, but certainly not necessarily acceptable, explanation behind why Garcia made the primary remarks.

Boren also offers in place a ridiculous situation by using Garcia claiming to wish to apologize to Woods i believe, but doesn't have his mobile phone number. If the Spaniard truly cared about making this call, he could probable acquire it.

Sergio Garcia's recent ideas was offensive and on no account aligns with TaylorMade-adidas Golf's ideals and corporate culture. We have spoken with Sergio straightaway and he clearly has got regret for his declaration and we believe she's sincere. We discussed with Sergio that his comments are clearly because of bounds and we are continuing to review the matter.